Six days after Showtime interview with Fina and McGettigan airs, judge rules Schultz-Curley bid to stop show moot

mdawson@centredaily.comSeptember 10, 2013 

San2

Prosecutors Joseph McGettigan III, left, and Frank Fina arrive at a hearing in January that was held at the Centre County Courthouse as part of the Jerry Sandusky case.

NABIL K. MARK — CDT file photo Buy Photo

A judge in Dauphin County has ruled that a defense motion to prevent a national news broadcast from airing a special on two Jerry Sandusky case prosecutors is a moot issue.

President Judge Todd Hoover’s ruling came Tuesday, six days after the lawyers for former university administrators Gary Schultz and Tim Curley tried to stop the broadcast, arguing in their emergency motion that it could taint the jury pool. The defense lawyers also said the comments were violations of a lawyer’s professional code of conduct.

The special aired on Showtime and focused on Frank Fina and Joseph E. McGettigan III, two lawyers who prosecuted the Sandusky case for the state Attorney General’s Office under Linda Kelly and have taken other jobs since Kathleen Kane took over the office. In the interviews for the program, Fina said he thinks Curley and Schultz conspired to hide abuse allegations against Sandusky, which is the basis for the charges against the two former university officials.

A prosecutor for the Kane administration called the defense motion “frivolous” and said Fina didn’t violate the code of conduct when he gave an interview.

The prosecutor, Bruce Beemer, said the defense lawyers have not asked for a gag order and have made comments of their own to the news media.

The prosecutor also called out the defense lawyers for making press statements after the preliminary hearing for Curley, Schultz and former university President Graham Spanier in July. Beemer said the lawyers likely violated the code of conduct when they attacked the credibility of prosecution witness Mike McQueary, who testified that he discussed with head coach Joe Paterno how the university handled the Sandusky crisis.

Beemer also argued that stopping the broadcast from airing would have been a First Amendment violation.

During the broadcast, Fina also said that he didn’t think Paterno was involved in the alleged cover-up, but that was not an issue in the defense motion.

Curley, Schultz and Spanier are awaiting trial on perjury, obstruction of justice and related charges. Their lawyers have maintained that their clients are innocent.

Mike Dawson can be reached at 231-4616. Follow him on Twitter @MikeDawsonCDT.

Centre Daily Times is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service