Letters to the Editor

June 25, 2013

Letter to the editor | More offensive than photos

In Charles C. Haynes’ June 18 column (“ ‘Gruesome’ images ban threatens free speech”), he mentions the recent refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Colorado appeals court decision banning anti-abortion activists from displaying gruesome images of mutilated fetuses because they thought that children (i.e., those children who hadn’t been killed in the womb) should be protected from such sights.

Related content