Centre Daily Times Logo

Amendola: Allegations in Sandusky case too vague | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

Amendola: Allegations in Sandusky case too vague

Mike Dawson

    ORDER REPRINT →

May 16, 2012 11:04 AM

BELLEFONTE — The attorney for Jerry Sandusky is again asking the judge to throw out the charges, this time less than three weeks before the case that has garnered national attention is scheduled to go to trial here in Centre County.

As Joe Amendola has maintained for months, he argued the allegations against his client are too vague. He also argued to toss the charges that stemmed from allegations of sexual abuse in which the alleged victims aren’t known.

The written arguments were in motions in limine filed Wednesday. If an attorney raises an issue in a motion in limine before trial and is denied by the judge, the attorney can appeal the issue after trial. 

The motions were filed before Amendola met Wednesday with the judge overseeing the case, John Cleland, and prosecutors Joseph E. McGettigan III, Jonelle Eshbach and Frank Fina for more than two hours in the Centre County Courthouse. It was a closed-door session.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

Prosecutors have said they’ve been as specific about the charges as they can be. They can’t provide anything more specific about the times or dates of the locations of alleged abuse than what they’ve already given to the defense. Earlier this year, they gave the defense a revised version of the year span, saying the alleged abuse happened between 1996 and 2009, not 1994 and 2009.

Amendola has said he can’t possibly account for every day of Sandusky’s life during those years and therefore can’t adequately prepare for trial. 

Amendola takes issue with the charges that do have a fixed date — the incident that Mike McQueary testified he saw Sandusky in an “extremely sexual” situation with a young boy in the Lasch Building shower room. It was determined to have been on Feb. 9, 2001, and the boy has been referred to as alleged victim No. 2.

In his filing, Amendola argued that McQueary’s testimony can’t sustain the charges.

Amendola also contested the charges stemming from a Penn State police investigated in 1998. He’s saying prosecutors can’t show there was anything sexual about that encounter, about which Sandusky said on national TV that he showered naked with a young boy after a workout.

Amendola also argued that the charges stemming from another shower incident in 2000 won’t stand up in court because the witness, a janitor, isn’t capable of testifying.

Criminal defense expert Jules Epstein, an associate professor at Widener University’s law school, said Amendola could be “preserving” certain issues that can be brought up on appeals if they’re denied before trial. 

“A good lawyer will always identify problem issues and file motions in limine,” he said.

Epstein said raising something in a motion in limine helps establish ground rules before trial.

“You might win the ruling and therefore be in a better strategic position at trial,” he said. “If you lose, you know definitely how the trial will occur.”

Judge Cleland still has not ruled on the defense’s motion to delay the trial, which Amendola made last week. 

The nature of the pre-trial conference on Wednesday with Amendola, the prosecutors and the judge wasn’t known. Cleland issued a gag order last month that prohibits attorneys from commenting to the media.

 The prosecutors left the courthouse a little after 12:30 p.m. and declined to answer questions. Eshbach made a hand motion that her lips were zipped.

Amendola left a few minutes later, carrying a large stack of papers. He joked briefly with reporters but declined to answer questions, citing the gag order.

Amendola filed a number of other requests on Wednesday:

He wants the judge to make prosecutors give him a written statement of any alleged criminal activity that hasn’t resulted in charges.

He’s asked the judge to order that AT&T and T-Mobile turn over phone records. Amendola is trying to see if the young men had communicated with one another during the grand jury investigation, and he wants to see if their phone and text message records show that.

He also asked to use a juror questionnaire during jury selection instead of voir dire, which would consist of attorneys questioning potential jurors to see if they can be impartial to hear the case.

He wants Judge Cleland to ask the grand jury judge to release grand jury testimony 30 days before trial. Currently, the defense is set to get transcripts 10 days before trial.

Mike Dawson can be reached at 231-4616. Follow him on Twitter @MikeDawsonCDT

Related stories from Centre Daily Times

HOMEPAGE

VIDEO: Joe Amendola leaves the courthouse

May 16, 2012 07:32 PM

  Comments  

Videos

Former Penn State administrators 'turned their backs' on child sex abuse, AG says

Fans discuss JoePa’s ‘glory days’

View More Video

Trending Stories

Former 5-star wide receiver George Campbell transfers to Penn State

February 20, 2019 02:53 PM

Penn State student charged in fatal crash is bound over for trial

February 20, 2019 03:37 PM

Here’s what’s closed Wednesday as Centre County gets hit with more winter weather

February 20, 2019 05:40 AM

A Centre County bridge is closed until further notice. Here’s why

February 20, 2019 04:00 PM

Committee approves Penn State AD Sandy Barbour’s new contract

February 21, 2019 02:21 PM

things to do

Read Next

Why several Penn State trustees request 3 actions to counter the Freeh report
Video media Created with Sketch.

Local

Why several Penn State trustees request 3 actions to counter the Freeh report

By Lauren Muthler and Kelsey Thomasson

    ORDER REPRINT →

June 29, 2018 07:54 PM

Several Penn State trustees on Friday held a special meeting to announce that they've finished their own review of the controversial Freeh Report and would like to make it public. However, without quorum present, they were unable to do so.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE JERRY SANDUSKY SCANDAL

As HBO releases ‘Paterno,’ Sandusky story still drags on

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

As HBO releases ‘Paterno,’ Sandusky story still drags on

April 08, 2018 10:38 PM
No new trial for Jerry Sandusky, judge says

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

No new trial for Jerry Sandusky, judge says

October 18, 2017 12:15 PM
Sandusky attorneys ask judge to look at email evidence

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

Sandusky attorneys ask judge to look at email evidence

October 18, 2017 09:51 AM
Sandusky appeal decision to come this week

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

Sandusky appeal decision to come this week

October 16, 2017 05:31 PM
Judge says Sandusky’s lawyers are ‘misleading.’ Lawyers counter judge is ‘baseless’

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

Judge says Sandusky’s lawyers are ‘misleading.’ Lawyers counter judge is ‘baseless’

October 05, 2017 05:19 PM
Judge grants Freeh’s motion, rules against Spanier defamation suit

Jerry Sandusky Scandal

Judge grants Freeh’s motion, rules against Spanier defamation suit

September 20, 2017 02:59 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story