Centre Daily Times Logo

Column | EPA must not tamper with its mileage tests | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion

Column | EPA must not tamper with its mileage tests

By Michael E. Kraft

    ORDER REPRINT →

September 16, 2013 12:34 AM

In 2010 and again in 2012, the Obama administration made one of its most important decisions on energy use and climate change.

It negotiated agreements with auto companies on new fuel economy standards for passenger vehicles that will reach up to 34 mpg by the model year 2016 and 54.5 mpg by 2025.

This is a 90 percent increase over previous levels, and it represents by far the biggest adjustment to vehicle fuel efficiency standards since their introduction in 1975. There also are new standards for medium and heavy-duty vehicles.

The passenger vehicle standards will result in sharp drops in release of both air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

The EPA estimates that greenhouse gas emissions from autos will be cut in half by 2025, making higher fuel efficiency standards the single most important action the federal government has taken on climate change.

The standards also reflect huge savings for drivers in fuel use and therefore in the cost of driving automobiles.

The EPA calculates that over time improved fuel economy will save consumers an amount equal to lowering the price of gasoline by $1 per gallon. The vehicles will cost a little more, but their higher efficiency more than makes up for the added cost. In fact, consumers will save about $8,000 per vehicle over its lifetime.

In addition, the standards are the most significant action the nation has taken to date to reduce its dependence on imported oil, thereby strengthening the country’s energy security and improving its economy. The fuel efficiency changes will reduce U.S. consumption of oil by about 2 million barrels a day by 2025. That’s the equivalent of one-half of what we import from OPEC nations every day.

There are additional gains from these actions. The standards encourage auto makers to innovate and invest in new technologies that are likely to make the U.S. more economically competitive and resilient in a shifting and uncertain global economy. Without the standards, Chinese and other foreign auto makers might well threaten domestic companies that lag behind in either fuel efficiency or automotive technologies that consumers are likely to demand.

Given all of these benefits to the nation, the EPA should reject efforts by the auto industry to revamp fuel economy standards or the testing procedures used to judge compliance with them.

The industry wants to make it easier for vehicles to meet the new mandates, in part because car makers would prefer to delay costly investments in new technologies.

Sadly, that has long been the posture of the industry. Auto companies have argued for decades that new environmental, safety and fuel economy standards were not technically achievable or were too costly to adopt. They wanted more wiggle room, and they still do.

By granting concessions to auto makers, the EPA would perpetuate use of old technologies and risk losing the substantial benefits that come with the new standards: improved air quality and public health, major fuel savings for consumers, a stronger economy, and essential reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

The federal government already offers the industry flexible and cost-effective compliance options. Thus without weakening standards or testing procedures, it can facilitate auto industry responses to tougher standards through existing credit trading systems, adjustments based on air conditioning system efficiency, credits for use of new energy-saving technologies and credits for use of non-conventional fuels.

The new fuel economy standards were adopted only after extensive consultation with the auto industry, auto workers, consumer groups, environmental and energy experts, and state governments.

Thirteen major auto makers supported the initiative to develop a consistent nationwide standard and create regulatory certainty going forward. To weaken the standards now would jeopardize the agreement and risk losing the enormous benefits that come with sticking to the original plan.

  Comments  

Videos

Woman tells her story of DUI arrest to prevent others from drinking and driving

‘I’m really grateful’ Nickal says of time at Penn State

View More Video

Trending Stories

Penn State’s Sandy Barbour becomes one of the Big Ten’s highest-paid athletic directors

February 22, 2019 12:31 PM

After donating sperm in State College, one man found his offspring — and love — decades later

February 22, 2019 12:24 PM

After plowing through snow days, Centre County school districts will extend school year

February 22, 2019 12:01 PM

Former Penn State kicker Robbie Gould understands speculation about possible Chicago Bears return

February 22, 2019 06:55 PM

Where does Penn State wrestling’s current win streak belong among other great PSU sports teams?

February 22, 2019 09:38 PM

things to do

Read Next

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Share Centre Region’s parks fairly; country best governed from our shared humanity

By CDT readers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 22, 2019 11:04 AM

Centre Daily Times letter writers share opinions on Centre Region parks, President Donald Trump.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Toftrees Avenue needs more pedestrian safety features; thanks, Penn State student

February 21, 2019 10:02 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Failures with Freeh report; townships should pay fair share for police protection

February 20, 2019 12:08 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Water runoff tax needed in State College; ban on Sunday hunting makes sense

February 17, 2019 03:45 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: What’s the history of State High alma mater?; Sexist ad had no place at Penn State

February 14, 2019 08:20 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Blame for offensive ad falls to Penn State; UConn has much to prove to fan base

February 13, 2019 08:54 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Rule changes needed in Pa. legislature; carelessness shown over ad at Penn State

February 13, 2019 10:57 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story