Centre Daily Times Logo

Column | Outmoded mileage tests badly shortchange consumers | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion

Column | Outmoded mileage tests badly shortchange consumers

By William H. Noack

    ORDER REPRINT →

September 16, 2013 12:35 AM

Of all the rules set forth by the federal government to regulate the U.S. auto industry — and there are thousands — none is more frustrating to consumers and car companies alike than the EPA’s requirement that fuel economy be posted on new-car stickers.

Very few consumers actually achieve the fuel economy posted on their sticker. The EPA itself has admitted that real-world fuel economy is usually about 20 percent lower than its own lab numbers.

Part of this is due to the quirky provisions of the testing procedures, and part is because a whole new generation of clean diesels, hybrids and electrics has rendered the testing protocol outdated, if not obsolete.

Bottom line: the EPA should either scrap the rule altogether or — at a minimum — repair it so it’s more in keeping with the fuel economy achieved by real people driving on real roads.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

The test procedures, themselves, are cumbersome. Since there are more than 250 car and truck nameplates available for sale in the United States, the EPA tests only about 15 percent of them in their labs. The automakers are allowed to test the others themselves and submit fuel economy data to the EPA for review.

To save costs, automakers are able to submit a single fuel economy number for all their vehicles with the same weight, engine and transmission, even if the outer sheet metal of the vehicles may be different.

The lab tests are done by placing vehicles on a mechanical treadmill called a dynamometer. Thus, the testing doesn’t take into consideration factors like individual driving styles, temperature or geography.

The test cycling of the dynamometers is also a bone of contention. Since the EPA test cycling favors city driving, many owners of hybrids say their real-world fuel economy is far less than the EPA numbers.

There have been class-action lawsuits over the discrepancies and even a “restating” of hybrid fuel economy by a major automaker.

Ironically, diesel owners point out that their vehicles — which generally are more efficient in highway driving — frequently do better than the EPA posted number.

Another factor that distorts the EPA numbers from real-world fuel economy is the fuel the agency uses in testing. It contains no ethanol.

Gasoline that we purchase today at gas stations across the country contains as much as 10 percent ethanol – which the EPA says can lower fuel economy by about four percent. It would seem logical that the EPA should use gasoline in its testing with the same ethanol content as that purchased by motorists when they fill up their tanks.

A cynic would say all the factors listed above indicate the vast bureaucracy of the EPA has gotten itself all tangled up in its mandated task of providing accurate fuel economy estimates. And the fact that so many consumers are not getting the advertised fuel economy is a sign that something’s clearly out of whack.

It’s no wonder the auto industry is quick to point out: “Your mileage may vary.” But consumers need valid mileage numbers to make valid buying decisions. Under the current standards all they have is confusion.

Most consumers would contend that vehicle fuel economy is a key factor in their purchase decision. When shopping for a car or truck, it’s a good thing to be aware of the vehicle’s efficiency — particularly at a time when gasoline prices tend to be so volatile.

That’s why the EPA has a responsibility to get the numbers right.

  Comments  

Videos

Woman tells her story of DUI arrest to prevent others from drinking and driving

Why Penn State’s OL is ‘hungry’ this offseason

View More Video

Trending Stories

Penn State Thon total tops $10 million for second consecutive year

February 17, 2019 04:16 PM

Scott Stossel’s win, Brady Berge’s return highlight Penn State wrestling’s Big Ten title-clinching win

February 17, 2019 04:52 PM

Penn State football freshmen, early enrollees dance at Thon 2019 pep rally

February 17, 2019 04:22 AM

Penn State wrestling mailbag: Can Iowa or Ohio State test the Nittany Lions at Big Tens?

February 18, 2019 05:08 PM

Letters: Water runoff tax needed in State College; ban on Sunday hunting makes sense

February 17, 2019 03:45 PM

things to do

Read Next

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Water runoff tax needed in State College; ban on Sunday hunting makes sense

By CDT readers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 17, 2019 03:45 PM

Centre Daily Times letters to the editor on water runoff tax in State College, Sunday hunting, Marc Friedenberg and gun laws.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION

Letters to the Editor

Letters: What’s the history of State High alma mater?; Sexist ad had no place at Penn State

February 14, 2019 08:20 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Blame for offensive ad falls to Penn State; UConn has much to prove to fan base

February 13, 2019 08:54 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Rule changes needed in Pa. legislature; carelessness shown over ad at Penn State

February 13, 2019 10:57 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Paterno’s Saudi Arabia connection; state of emergency was warranted

February 09, 2019 07:22 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Thankful after tragedy; Sunday hunting is a property rights issue

February 09, 2019 07:21 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Get used to polar vortex effects; New York abortion law protects women’s health

February 08, 2019 09:02 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story