Centre Daily Times Logo

What will the high school really cost? | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion

What will the high school really cost?

By Don E. Gordon

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 18, 2014 01:17 AM

The State College Area School District’s State High project is a slam-dunk. There is 91 percent public approval, according to the school board’s opinion articles in the Centre Daily Times last weekend.

However, the board again evades the total tax burden. Before you vote on the May 20 referendum, understand the total tax numbers absent the hoopla.

Last summer, the State College school board asked voters how much tax increase they would approve for the State High project.

Half of “91 percent” answered 5 percent or less. According to the survey, 5 percent of respondents would support a $90 million high school.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

Six months later, the cost is $115 million.

The district asks for an $85 million referendum and $30 million more weaned from the base budget.

In the survey, only 36 percent approved a 7.2 percent referendum tax increase. But the referendum question does not state the amount of the tax increase.

The board listened but did not hear.

Now the school board tours the community proselytizing for a more expensive high school, not a 5 percent tax-increase limit.

The $30 million more comes from expiring debt service (forget that tax reduction), most revenue growth, much of the district’s general reserves, reducing some essential services and limiting payroll growth to 1.9 percent (compared with 2.5 percent to 7 percent since 2006 ).

That is not likely.

As of the December finance reports, an $85 million debt would create a new tax of 2.75 mills for 30 years. The new tax is twice as much as the annual 1.14 mill increase for the entire base budget projected each year. Add 2.75 to 1.14.

Multiply 3.9 times your home’s assessed value and divide by 1,000 to see your total tax increase in dollars. The district’s online calculator does not show the total tax increase.

District finance reports show that exploding pension costs will be higher than the high school cost but fully included in the Act 1 limits. That is not probable.

The Public School Employees’ Retirement System is not a red herring; it is a red balance sheet.

The district is front-loading $8 million of $11 million designated pension reserve the first five years, thereby creating exceptional increases for taxpayers after five years. The strategy is to make the referendum look affordable in the short term.

We will pay more later.

A better solution is a $70 million referendum for 20, not 30 years; hence, a lower municipal bond rate, less annual debt service and a maximum 5 percent tax increase. It also would save about $50 million better paid for education or pension than bond interest.

The district’s bond credit rating (higher bond cost) of AA-minus — rather than AA or AAA — is a downgrade caused by the SWAP fiasco. We are still paying for that.

Our municipalities and school district share the same tax base. The county and every municipality in the school district held their 2014 budgets to zero tax increase.

How do municipalities do that? The answer is fiduciary responsibility and prudence.

By contrast, since 2004, SCASD has increased property taxes on average 3 percent each year. The district also receives the equivalent of 2 percent more from new property, transfer and earned income tax increases each year — for a total of 5 percent.

Now it asks for a new 7.2 percent increase from referendum as enrollment continues to decline.

A successful high school referendum may depend on the best value rather than the very best high school. It is the school board’s choice now; it is the voters’ choice on May 20.

To see comparative total tax tables, citations for this column and the PSERS enigma, visit StateCollegeWatchdog.com.

  Comments  

Videos

Woman tells her story of DUI arrest to prevent others from drinking and driving

State Rep. Scott Conklin discusses PIAA playoff legislation

View More Video

Trending Stories

State College shooter’s ‘Hometown Hero’ banner removed

February 14, 2019 03:03 PM

Penn State assistant coach Phil Galiano leaving to pursue NFL opportunity

February 15, 2019 09:20 AM

Jury returns verdict in child rape trial for Mifflin County man

February 15, 2019 01:36 PM

Former Penn State WR Juwan Johnson transferring to Oregon Ducks

February 14, 2019 07:10 PM

5 things Penn State wrestling fans should watch this weekend with the postseason looming

February 14, 2019 08:39 PM

things to do

Read Next

Letters to the Editor

Letters: What’s the history of State High alma mater?; Sexist ad had no place at Penn State

By CDT readers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 14, 2019 08:20 PM

Centre Daily Times readers express opinion about EPA, Penn State and more.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Blame for offensive ad falls to Penn State; UConn has much to prove to fan base

February 13, 2019 08:54 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Rule changes needed in Pa. legislature; carelessness shown over ad at Penn State

February 13, 2019 10:57 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Paterno’s Saudi Arabia connection; state of emergency was warranted

February 09, 2019 07:22 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Thankful after tragedy; Sunday hunting is a property rights issue

February 09, 2019 07:21 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Get used to polar vortex effects; New York abortion law protects women’s health

February 08, 2019 09:02 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Penn State saw something, said nothing; Thompson took the right action on horse legislation

February 07, 2019 08:49 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story