Centre Daily Times Logo

Column | The troubling case of Freddie Hall | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion

Column | The troubling case of Freddie Hall

By Marc J. Tasse

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 27, 2014 12:07 AM

Soon after his birth in 1945, Freddie Hall’s family knew something was different about him.

And later, he was slow to learn, to walk and to talk, and it was challenging for his family to understand his speech. He was raised under difficult circumstances in an impoverished and abusive home, the 16th of 17 children, and showed early signs of serious intellectual and developmental delays.

Hall’s elementary school teachers also noticed his problems with learning and recommended a special education teacher, as shown in school records dating from the 1950s. His fourth-grade, sixth-grade, seventh-grade and eighth-grade teachers all wrote that he was “mentally retarded.”

There is no indication that Hall ever received the special educational support his teachers recommended. After being “socially promoted” through school, Hall dropped out in the 11th grade.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

As an adult, Hall is illiterate and cannot perform basic math. Clinicians who have conducted psychological evaluations of him have said his functioning is comparable to that of a first-grader.

Tragically for all concerned, Hall was involved in the murders of two people. He is now on death row in Florida.

His intellectual disability — once classified as mental retardation — affected his ability to work with defense attorneys. In sworn affidavits, two attorneys relayed how much Hall’s diminished capacities limited their ability to communicate with him. One attorney wrote that he was unable to understand anything Hall said.

In 1991, a Florida trial court found that Hall had been “mentally retarded his entire life.” In 2002, in its Atkins v. Virginia decision, the U.S. Supreme Court prohibited the execution of people with what was then called mental retardation.

So how is it possible that someone with Hall’s lifelong history of intellectual disability could still be sitting on death row?

The answer is Florida’s unusual and nonscientific standard for determining intellectual disability in capital cases. On March 3, the constitutionality of Florida’s standard, which runs counter to the universally accepted clinical practice for making a determination of intellectual disability, will be at issue when the Supreme Court hears Hall’s case.

Florida’s statute is actually consistent with the clinical definitions of intellectual disability on which Atkins relied. The statute prohibits the execution of a person who has significantly sub-average intellectual functioning and concurrent deficits in adaptive functioning, both of which must be manifested before age 18.

Similar criteria have been applied by clinicians to diagnose intellectual disability for more than half a century.

But the Florida Supreme Court went astray in 2007, when it held that in order for an individual in a capital case to prove that he or she has intellectual disability, he or she must first establish an IQ test score of 70 or below.

Florida’s rigid cutoff of an IQ test score of 70 conflicts with the accepted clinical practice that IQ test scores must be interpreted by taking into account the standard error of measurement inherent in all such tests.

No IQ test is without measurement error. That means that any IQ test score is best understood as falling within a range, rather than a single exact score. Accepted clinical practice tells us, for example, that an IQ score of 70 indicates that the person’s “true” IQ score is most likely between 65 and 75.

Hall has been diagnosed with intellectual disability by multiple psychiatrists and psychologists. His IQ test scores on the “gold standard” Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale cluster in the 65-75 range. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (formerly known as the American Association on Mental Retardation) and the American Psychiatric Association recognize that range of intellectual functioning as consistent with intellectual disability.

However, Florida has chosen to deny Hall the right to present the considerable — some would say incontrovertible — evidence of his intellectual disability because Hall has obtained IQ scores slightly above 70.

The Florida Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling means that the state refuses to consider the ample evidence of Hall’s lifelong disability in making a determination of whether he is legally eligible for execution.

That’s not only wrong but also unscientific and a breach of Hall’s constitutional protection as mandated by the Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virginia.

Though Atkins leaves discretion to the states regarding how to enforce the prohibition on executing defendants with intellectual disability, that ruling does not allow the states to create their own criteria for defining intellectual disability that are not in keeping with the professional consensus.

The Florida standard for assessing intellectual disability in death penalty cases — shared by, at most, four states — is clinically and scientifically unjustified.

Unless reversed by the Supreme Court, it will result in people with intellectual disability being executed, contrary to the protections provided in Atkins.

  Comments  

Videos

Woman tells her story of DUI arrest to prevent others from drinking and driving

Snow has covered roads across the county

View More Video

Trending Stories

Here’s why Penn State wrestler Shakur Rasheed will ‘unfortunately’ be honored on Senior Day

February 19, 2019 05:44 PM

Centre County to be hit with another ‘wintry mix.’ Here’s what it could mean for your commute

February 19, 2019 12:26 PM

Penn State wrestling no longer the unanimous NWCA No. 1 after a big win for the Cowboys

February 19, 2019 06:44 PM

Here’s what’s closed Wednesday as Centre County gets hit with more winter weather

February 20, 2019 05:40 AM

‘Be vigilant and careful.’ Group of cows still on the loose in Spring Township

February 20, 2019 09:11 AM

things to do

Read Next

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Failures with Freeh report; townships should pay fair share for police protection

By CDT readers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 20, 2019 12:08 PM

Centre Daily Times letters to the edition on the Freeh report and Penn State reaction, townships paying fair share for state police protection and more.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Water runoff tax needed in State College; ban on Sunday hunting makes sense

February 17, 2019 03:45 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: What’s the history of State High alma mater?; Sexist ad had no place at Penn State

February 14, 2019 08:20 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Blame for offensive ad falls to Penn State; UConn has much to prove to fan base

February 13, 2019 08:54 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Rule changes needed in Pa. legislature; carelessness shown over ad at Penn State

February 13, 2019 10:57 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Paterno’s Saudi Arabia connection; state of emergency was warranted

February 09, 2019 07:22 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Thankful after tragedy; Sunday hunting is a property rights issue

February 09, 2019 07:21 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story