After reading Donna Queeney and Chief Tom King’s April 4 column about red-light cameras, I contacted the National Motorists Association.
Based on its information, the “benefits” of red-light cameras can be countered by noting that for every study King cited showing safety improvements, there’s another study that finds just the opposite.
For example, a 2008 report from the University of South Florida found that “Comprehensive studies conclude cameras actually increase crashes and injuries.”
Regarding the insurance industry, USF researchers re-evaluated the study’s data and methodology and concluded that red-light cameras were not associated with differences in fatal red-light running or total fatal crash rates.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times
The most effective way to ensure intersection safety is through proper engineering.
Simple improvements such as making sure the yellow-light times are adequate are much more effective than red-light cameras.
The Texas Transportation Institute found that a one-second increase in the yellow-light duration yielded a 40 percent decrease in accidents and a 50 percent decrease in red-light violations.
The city of Loma Linda, Calif., increased yellow-light times by one second and decreased red-light violations by 92 percent.
Camera revenue plunged, and the city removed the cameras.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported that, since 2012, the number of cities using red-light cameras has dropped 6 percent.
Red-light cameras are not primarily about safety but about revenue. Many communities that employ them face costly legal challenges, contract disputes and ultimately loss of public trust.
Red-light cameras are not needed in State College.
Albert Vannice, Boalsburg