Centre Daily Times Logo

Little to show for Chesapeake Bay billions | Centre Daily Times

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • eEdition
    • Newsletters
    • Subscribe
    • About Us
    • Local
    • Penn State
    • Sandusky Scandal
    • Communities
    • Crime
    • Business
    • Education
    • Politics
    • Public Records
    • State
    • Nation/World
    • Weird News
    • Sports
    • College
    • Golf
    • High School
    • MLB
    • Motorsports
    • NFL
    • NHL
    • Outdoors
    • Penn State
    • State College Spikes
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • PSU Sports
    • PSU Football
    • PSU Basketball
    • PSU Baseball
    • PSU Hockey
    • PSU Soccer
    • PSU Volleyball
    • PSU Wrestling
    • Nittany Lines Blog
  • Penn State Football
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Family Pages
    • Eat, Play, Live
    • Home & Garden
    • Entertainment
    • Weekender
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Celebrities
    • Horoscopes
    • Movie News & Reviews
    • Music
    • TV
    • Opinion
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Submit a Letter
  • Obituaries

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion

Little to show for Chesapeake Bay billions

By Ed Schafer

    ORDER REPRINT →

August 03, 2016 12:33 AM

Pennsylvania is facing one of its largest environmental crises, and it’s largely going unnoticed despite taxpayers spending billions with little results to show for it.

Six years ago, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency established a program to restore the Chesapeake Bay. Each state in the watershed was given nitrogen reduction goals to meet this effort or face penalties.

Pennsylvania was deemed responsible for half of all nitrogen runoff within the watershed with the livestock industry being a major contributor.

Six years later, Pennsylvania has spent $4 billion with almost nothing to show for it. Nitrogen levels have only been reduced by 6 percent, and Pennsylvania is in default of its Chesapeake Bay targets. While other states are being lauded for their performance, the EPA indicated in May it might have to step in to get the commonwealth back on track.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

This environmental crisis has also become a drain on taxpayers, who have little or no say in the process. That’s because the process is controlled by state bureaucrats and special interests. In controlling the cleanup process, they have bypassed less expensive solutions in favor of multimillion dollar treatment plan upgrades in communities across Pennsylvania.

Of the $4 billion spent, half has been at the expense of local homeowners and businesses through rate increases. Taxpayers lose at the expense of bond banks, lawyers and contractors.

It’s time for the Pennsylvania General Assembly to step in and start asking hard questions.

What makes this more egregious while Pennsylvania is really no closer to achieving its goals six years later, cleanup costs will likely require $15 billion in additional spending unless the legislature acts to change the process and provide oversight.

The state Department of Environmental Protection has proposed establishing 95,000 acres of forested riparian buffers in the Bay Watershed to capture nitrogen. But almost half of the nitrogen emitted by livestock is airborne ammonia, which bypass buffers.

Pennsylvania should consider point-source manure treatment technology, which is cost-effective and treats animal waste onsite literally as it leaves the animal and before it reaches the atmosphere or water. Developed in partnership between farmers and the private sector, these technologies can remove up to 85 percent of all nitrogen and these low cost verified nutrient reductions can be applied to the commonwealth’s EPA Bay mandate.

In 2013, the bipartisan state Legislative Budget and Finance Committee concluded that competitively bidding nutrient credits would lead to 80 percent reduction in bay cleanup costs for Pennsylvania taxpayers/ratepayers.

We certainly understand this is a complicated issue, but look at it this way: If any other government-run enterprise had wasted $4 billion in taxpayer funds and had no real results to show for it, taxpayers would be up in arms. Legislative hearings would be held; and hard questions would be asked.

That time has come because the price tag for Pennsylvania taxpayers is about to increase by billions of dollars.

Hon. Ed Schafer is a member of the Coalition for Affordable Bay Solutions. He was the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture from 2008-09 and governor of North Dakota from 1992-2000. He is also a director of Bion Environmental Technologies. For more information, see: http://affordablebay solutions.org.

  Comments  

Videos

Woman tells her story of DUI arrest to prevent others from drinking and driving

Penn State football players dance at Thon 2019 pep rally

View More Video

Trending Stories

Penn State wrestler Jason Nolf still full of surprises in dominant win over Michigan State

February 15, 2019 10:59 PM

Downtown State College has lost some iconic restaurants. What do the replacements offer?

February 15, 2019 11:32 AM

Thon 2019 kicks off with surprise performance by Andy Grammer

February 15, 2019 10:20 PM

Is Penn State wrestler Brady Berge still the 149-pound starter? Here’s what Cael Sanderson said

February 15, 2019 10:23 PM

State of the program: Nittany Lions address Galiano, early enrollees as spring camp nears

February 16, 2019 07:00 PM

things to do

Read Next

Letters to the Editor

Letters: What’s the history of State High alma mater?; Sexist ad had no place at Penn State

By CDT readers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 14, 2019 08:20 PM

Centre Daily Times readers express opinion about EPA, Penn State and more.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Centre Daily Times

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Blame for offensive ad falls to Penn State; UConn has much to prove to fan base

February 13, 2019 08:54 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Rule changes needed in Pa. legislature; carelessness shown over ad at Penn State

February 13, 2019 10:57 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Paterno’s Saudi Arabia connection; state of emergency was warranted

February 09, 2019 07:22 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Thankful after tragedy; Sunday hunting is a property rights issue

February 09, 2019 07:21 PM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Get used to polar vortex effects; New York abortion law protects women’s health

February 08, 2019 09:02 AM

Letters to the Editor

Letters: Penn State saw something, said nothing; Thompson took the right action on horse legislation

February 07, 2019 08:49 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Centre Daily Times App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story