Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Opinion Columns & Blogs

Opinion: What happens to diversity programs in Trump’s America?

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, with the Republican Party holding sway over the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court, diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging, and accessibility (DEIBA) programs face a threat. Trump’s Republican Party, emboldened by a mandate of power, has already signaled intentions to restrict or eliminate diversity programs. That approach, gaining momentum in Republican-led states, restricts funding or explicitly forbids DEIBA initiatives. But sweeping DEIBA under the rug is a shortsighted maneuver, one likely to exacerbate social problems.

The crux of the matter has to do with the ongoing shifts in U.S. demographics. The American population is rapidly diversifying. Recent projections indicate that the United States will soon become a majority-minority nation. This demographic shift brings to the surface new challenges for an inclusive society. Ignoring or eradicating DEIBA programs in such an environment can be counterproductive. In seeking to ignore issues of diversity, the administration risks driving them underground to fester. Racism, sexism, ableism and homophobia are issues that cannot be addressed simply by turning a blind eye.

The abolition of diversity programs risks not only reinforcing systemic inequalities but also creating a dangerous undercurrent of unresolved tensions. Issues like gay rights, trans rights, and accessibility for people with disabilities may be sidelined, but they will not disappear any more than outlawing abortion will eliminate it entirely.

By ignoring diversity issues, the government could be setting the stage for serious civil rights conflicts. History has shown that sidelining civil rights issues leads to protests, advocacy, and, in extreme cases, civil unrest. Efforts to erase diversity and inclusion from the national discourse could easily result in an explosion of these issues. People will not simply acquiesce to being marginalized. If DEIBA programs are abolished, society may see a surge of activism from diverse communities and their allies, potentially leading to conflict that is intensified by the white power groups with which Trump has aligned himself.

Addressing diversity is about economics as much as about morality. The U.S. economy relies on a diverse workforce, and businesses know that inclusive environments foster innovation and productivity. Eliminating DEIBA programs will hinder not only social progress but also economic potential.

The potential fallout of a DEIBA program rollback during Trump’s second term is significant. It threatens to create a society marked by even deeper divisions. Instead of working toward a more equitable society, the administration’s policies may exacerbate existing inequalities, setting the stage for a future fraught with civil rights battles. As history has shown, suppressing diversity issues is not a solution — it is an invitation for greater, and likely more intense, conflict. The question then becomes not if, but when, this ticking time bomb of social tension will erupt.

William J. Rothwell is distinguished professor of workforce education and development on the University Park campus of Penn State University.
Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER